The Justice Department proposed a major update Wednesday to the law that shields internet companies from liability for content on their sites — a move that is even broader than President Donald Trump's attempts to hold platforms like Twitter and Facebook to account for decisions found to be politically biased.
DOJ's proposal, which would need Congress' blessing, would address a wide range of criticisms of the protections that digital companies have enjoyed under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a 1996 law that has been critical to the online industry's wealth and power.
Among the changes: Sites or platforms that facilitate third-party content that violates federal law would no longer be able to claim immunity from lawsuits. Users could sue companies in cases that involve child sexual abuse, terrorism and cyberstalking. It also would be easier for users to sue over platforms' decisions to take down their content, a change intended to push companies to be more fair in removing content they find objectionable.
The Justice Department also proposed changes to clarify that companies can’t use Section 230 to get out of civil suits by the federal government, or antitrust suits.
Dozens of lawmakers of both parties have expressed concerns about the broad protections given to internet firms under Section 230, though they disagree what aspects are problematic and how it should be fixed.
The Clinton-era legal shield has been heralded as the law that helped build the internet, but Attorney General Bill Barr and others have raised questions about the scope of the law and whether tech companies have used Section 230 to absolve themselves of responsibility for policing their platforms. Trump and his presumptive Democratic rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, have both called for Congress to repeal Section 230 entirely — though for much different reasons.
In February, the Justice Department held a workshop on Section 230 where prominent critics of the law outlined how companies have avoided liability for posts that allegedly aided terrorism, sex trafficking and revenge porn.
Last month, Trump signed an executive order targeting social media companies that he accuses of censoring conservative viewpoints. The order came after Twitter posted fact-checks on his tweets. An industry-funded tech nonprofit has challenged the order’s constitutionality.
The proposal unveiled Wednesday is intended both as a follow-up to the February workshop and a response to Trump’s executive order. DOJ has submitted a proposed bill to the Office of Management and Budget, which will consult with other Trump administration agencies before sending the legislation to Congress, a senior DOJ official said.
The Wall Street Journal initially reported Wednesday that the DOJ was offering the legislative proposal.
Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) in March unveiled their own legislation that would remove digital firms' legal immunity over users’ posts if they fail to prove they are doing enough to curtail sexual exploitation of children online.
"industry" - Google News
June 18, 2020 at 12:09AM
https://ift.tt/2N6Mp98
DOJ proposes crackdown on tech industry's legal shield - POLITICO
"industry" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2RrQtUH
https://ift.tt/2zJ3SAW
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "DOJ proposes crackdown on tech industry's legal shield - POLITICO"
Post a Comment